Litigation under the Access to Public Information Legislation 2013- 2023
Authors of the analyses are the attorneys-at-law from AIP legal team: Alexander Kashumov, Kiril Terziiski, and Stephan Anguelov.
Litigation under the Access to Public Information Legislation 2013 - 2023, Access to Information Programme, 2024, 80 pages, ISBN 978-954-9953-58-9
Issued in the frames of the 10 Years Court Practice under Access to Public Information Act supported by a grant from The Netherlands Embassy at Sofia, Bulgaria.
Public Participation and Access to Information (15 Years of the APIA, 37 Stories of NGOs)
Translation in English is available: http://www.aip-bg.org/en/cases/37_NGO_Cases_2005_2015/202943/.
Public Participation and Access to Information (15 Years of the APIA, 37 Stories of NGOs), Access to Information Programme, 2016, 140 стр., ISBN 978-954-9953-52-7
Litigation under the Access to Public Information Legislation
Litigation under the Access to Public Information Legislation, Access to Information Programme, 2012, 168 pages, ISBN 978-954-9953-49-7
Access to Information Litigation in Bulgaria 2005-2008: Selected Cases, volume 4
The book was published in 2008. It contains analytical part, which reviews the main problems related to the court practice with regard to the Access to Public Information Act during the last years. The analysis encompasses the development of both cases related to the exercise of the right of access to public information and to the implementation of the exemptions from the right of access to information. Summaries and twenty-seven decisions on 14 court cases in which AIP legal team has provided legal help, including court representation, were included as appendices to the book.
At the presentation of the volume 4 of the Access to Public Information Litigation in Bulgaria (2005-2008), the Chairman of the Supreme Administrative Court, Mr. Konstantin Penchev noted:
We may have the best laws, but we have to implement them, i.e. the society shall make the mechanism work. I would like to thank to the Access to Information Programme because theymade the court think over and apply the law. They made the court answer – sometimes correctly, sometimes not, but developing its practices – the questions set forth.